YARN-11504. [Addendum] [Federation] YARN Federation Supports Non-HA mode#5746
Merged
slfan1989 merged 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom Jun 14, 2023
Merged
YARN-11504. [Addendum] [Federation] YARN Federation Supports Non-HA mode#5746slfan1989 merged 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom
slfan1989 merged 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@slfan1989 I took a closer look at this piece of code, and we should consider the logic for compatibility with HA,Please review it |
Contributor
|
@yl09099 Thanks for your contribution, LGTM. |
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
slfan1989
approved these changes
Jun 14, 2023
Contributor
|
@yl09099 Thank you for your feedback! Upon reviewing the code, I found that we execute the specified logic in non-HA mode. However, when HA is enabled, it should remain consistent with the original logic. Merged Into trunk. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
When I was submitting (#5716) the PR, I found that junit reported an error, I took a closer look at this piece of code, and we should consider the logic for compatibility with HA
How was this patch tested?
For code changes:
LICENSE,LICENSE-binary,NOTICE-binaryfiles?